Non-invasive diagnosis of diaphragmatic paralysis in botulism using ultrasound.

This case study explores foodborne botulism, a severe illness caused by botulinum neurotoxin-contaminated food. It leads to bilateral descending paralysis, involving the diaphragm. We highlight diaphragmatic ultrasound as a non-invasive diagnostic tool. A 50-year-old obese male developed diplopia and weakness after consuming contaminated food, rapidly progressing to severe symptoms. Mechanical ventilation became necessary due to respiratory failure. Diaphragmatic ultrasound confirmed bilateral diaphragm paralysis despite early antitoxin treatment. The patient experienced complications, requiring tracheostomy and rehabilitation. After five months, he fully recovered diaphragmatic function. This study underscores botulism's life-threatening nature and the vital role of supportive care. Diaphragmatic ultrasound is a safe and effective method for assessing diaphragmatic function in such cases, obviating ionizing radiation exposure. We recommend its routine use for evaluating botulism-induced paralysis.

Phrenic Nerve Dysfunction Secondary to Cervical Neuroforaminal Stenosis: A Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Phrenic nerve dysfunction has been associated with cervical neuroforaminal stenosis in limited case reports and case-controlled studies. It is unclear if magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine should be included in the workup of patients with pulmonary dysfunction. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted on the topic to provide an outline of the body of knowledge and some guidance for neurosurgeons that receive these patient referrals. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted through the PubMed database to identify articles related to phrenic nerve dysfunction secondary to cervical stenosis. RESULTS: A total of 12 case reports were found. The median subject age was 64 years, 11 were male. Presenting symptoms included shortness of breath (n = 9), radiculopathy (n = 7), myelopathy (n = 5), reduced pulmonary function (n = 6), weakness (n = 4), and neck pain (n = 5). Ten of these patients underwent surgical intervention, all having improvements in their pulmonary and neurological symptoms at follow-up ranging from 10 days to 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stenosis, resulting in neuroforaminal stenosis, may be related to phrenic nerve dysfunction in select patients with idiopathic diaphragmatic paralysis or pulmonary dysfunction. Surgical decompression improves pulmonary and neurological symptoms.

Ultrasound imaging of diaphragmatic motion.

The diaphragm is the key muscle of respiration, especially in infants. Diaphragmatic dysfunction and paralysis can have significant implications for medical management and treatment, and they can be challenging to diagnose by clinical parameters alone. Multiple imaging modalities are useful for assessing the diaphragm, but US - specifically M-mode US - offers several distinct advantages and few limitations compared to fluoroscopy, radiography, CT and MRI. The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the pathophysiology of the diaphragm, review common indications for dynamic diaphragmatic US, describe optimal imaging technique, and discuss how to avoid imaging pitfalls.

The many paths to diagnose diaphragmatic paralysis: Cardiopulmonary ultrasound on stage.

Abnormal diaphragmatic motion (ADM) due to phrenic nerve injury is a recognized complication of cardiac surgery and several diagnostic techniques can be used to determine the diagnosis. Due to its relationship with the diaphragm, cardiac kinetics is affected by the abnormal movement of the diaphragm in cases of left hemidiaphragm paralysis. The authors present a case of diaphragmatic paralysis in which the initial diagnosis is made through echocardiography.

Diaphragmatic paralysis in COVID-19: a rare cause of postacute sequelae of COVID-19 dyspnoea.

We describe a 56-year-old female patient hospitalised with COVID-19 in April 2020 who had persistent respiratory symptoms after radiographic and microbiologic recovery. X-ray of the chest demonstrated an elevated right hemidiaphragm while fluoroscopy confirmed unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. Symptoms resolved gradually, concurrent with restoration of right hemidiaphragm function. Thus, we describe a rare cause of postacute sequelae of COVID-19 dyspnoea.

Outcome analysis of a conservative approach to diaphragmatic paralysis following congenital cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a bicentric retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Diaphragmatic paralysis following congenital cardiac surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Spontaneous recovery of diaphragmatic function has been described, contrasting with centres providing early diaphragmatic plication. We aimed to describe the outcomes of a conservative approach, as well as to identify factors associated with a failure of the strategy. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients admitted after cardiac surgery and suffering unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis within 2 French Paediatric Cardiac Surgery Centers. The conservative approach, defined by the prolonged use of ventilation until successful weaning from respiratory support, was the primary strategy adopted in both centres. In case of unsuccessful evolution, a diaphragmatic plication was scheduled. Total ventilation time included invasive and non-invasive ventilation. Diaphragm asymmetry was defined by the number of posterior rib segments counted between the 2 hemi-diaphragms on the chest X-ray after cardiac surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-one neonates and infants were included in the analysis. Patients' median age was 12.0 days at cardiac surgery (5.0-82.0), and median weight was 3.5 kg (2.8-4.9). The conservative approach was successful for 32/51 patients (63%), whereas 19/51 patients (37%) needed diaphragm plication. There was no difference in patients' characteristics between groups. Respiratory support prolonged for 21 days or more and diaphragm asymmetry more than 2 rib segments were independently associated with the failure of the conservative strategy [odds ratio (OR) 6.9 (1.29-37.3); P = 0.024 and OR 6.0 (1.4-24.7); P = 0.013, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The conservative approach was successful for 63% of the patients. We identified risk factors associated with the strategy's failure.

Diaphragmatic paralysis, respiratory function, and postoperative pain after interscalene brachial plexus block with a reduced dose of 10 ml levobupivacaine 0.25% versus a 20 ml dose in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: study protocol for the randomized controlled double-blind REDOLEV study.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery causes severe postoperative pain. An interscalene brachial plexus block provides adequate analgesia, but unintended spread of the local anesthetic administered may result in a phrenic nerve block, usually associated with a nonnegligible incidence of acute hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. The main purpose of this trial will be to analyze the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis ensuing after interscalene brachial plexus block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery administered a standard volume (20 ml) vs. a low volume (10 ml) of levobupivacaine 0.25%. METHODS: This will be a prospective double-blind randomized controlled single-center two-arm comparative trial. Forty-eight patients will be included. The primary goal will be to ultrasonographically determine the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by calculating the diaphragmatic thickness ratio in each group. The secondary goals will be to compare the two arms in terms of (1) decrease in forced vital capacity and (2) in forced expiratory volume at 1 s by spirometry; (3) decrease in diaphragmatic excursion by ultrasound; (4) 24-h total intravenous morphine consumption; (5) time to first opioid request of a patient-controlled analgesia pump; and (6) postoperative complications. DISCUSSION: This trial will demonstrate that a low-volume interscalene brachial plexus block decreases hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following arthroscopic shoulder surgery according to spirometry and ultrasound measurements and does not provide inferior postoperative analgesia to the standard volume, as measured by opioid requirements. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT and Spanish Trial Register (REec) registration number: 2019-003855-12 (registered on 7 January 2020). ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT04385966 (retrospectively registered on 8 May 2020). Ethics Committee approval: EC19/093 (18 December 2019).

Treatment for bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction using phrenic nerve reconstruction and diaphragm pacemakers.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction results in severe dyspnoea, usually requiring oxygen therapy and nocturnal ventilatory support. Although treatment options are limited, phrenic nerve reconstruction (PR) offers the opportunity to restore functional activity. This study aims to evaluate combination treatment with PR and placement of a diaphragm pacemaker (DP) compared to DP placement alone in patients with bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction. METHODS: Patients with bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction were prospectively enrolled in the following treatment algorithm: Unilateral PR was performed on the more severely impacted side with bilateral DP implantation. Motor amplitudes, ultrasound measurements of diaphragm thickness, maximal inspiratory pressure, forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity and subjective patient-reported outcomes were obtained for retrospective analysis following completion of the prospective database. RESULTS: Fourteen male patients with bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction confirmed on chest fluoroscopy and electrodiagnostic testing were included. All 14 patients required nocturnal ventilator support, and 8/14 (57.1%) were oxygen-dependent. All patients reported subjective improvement, and all 8 oxygen-dependent patients were able to discontinue oxygen therapy following treatment. Improvements in maximal inspiratory pressure, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume were 68%, 47% and 53%, respectively. There was an average improvement of 180% in motor amplitude and a 50% increase in muscle thickness. Comparison of motor amplitude changes revealed significantly greater functional recovery on the PR + DP side. CONCLUSIONS: PR and simultaneous implantation of a DP may restore functional activity and alleviate symptoms in patients with bilateral diaphragmatic dysfunction. PR plus diaphragm pacing appear to result in greater functional muscle recovery than pacing alone.

Fluorographic findings of diaphragmatic paralysis with spontaneous recovery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative diaphragmatic paralysis is an unavoidable complication of cardiovascular surgery. Although diaphragmatic plication, as a surgical treatment, can be performed, spontaneous recovery is possible. We aimed to identify differences in fluorographic findings of diaphragmatic paralysis between pediatric patients with and without spontaneous recovery within 1 year of intrathoracic surgery. METHODS: Ten children, who had been followed-up for at least 1 year post-surgery and who had not received diaphragmatic plication were included and classified into those with or without spontaneous recovery. The presence or absence of the paradoxical movement of the diaphragm and mediastinum was evaluated based on fluorographic findings. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the presence or absence of paradoxical movement between the groups. RESULTS: Eight patients experienced spontaneous recovery. The mean ± standard deviation time to spontaneous recovery was 150 ± 114 days (range, 18-338 days). In the spontaneous recovery group, no patient had paradoxical movement of the mediastinum, and a significant between-group difference was observed in the presence of the paradoxical movement of the mediastinum (present/absent in patients with vs. without spontaneous recovery: 0/8 vs. 2/0, P = 0.02). There was no significant between-group difference in paradoxical movement of the diaphragm (present/absent in patients with vs. without spontaneous recovery: 1/7 vs. 2/0, P = 0.07). Pediatric patients without paradoxical movement of the mediastinum spontaneously recovered within 1 year of intrathoracic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients without paradoxical movement of the mediastinum, based on fluorography findings, spontaneously recovered within 1 year of surgery. The timing of spontaneous recovery varied between cases.

Incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis after ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: An intermediate cervical plexus block (CPB) targets the posterior cervical space between the sternocleidomastoid muscle and the prevertebral fascia. The phrenic nerve descends obliquely on the surface of the anterior scalene muscle beneath the prevertebral fascia after originating from the C3-C5 ventral rami. Therefore, the phrenic nerve can be affected by a local anesthetic during an intermediate CPB, depending on the permeability characteristics of the prevertebral fascia. This study investigated whether an intermediate CPB affects the phrenic nerve, inducing hemidiaphragmatic paresis. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 20 patients undergoing single-incision transaxillary robot-assisted right thyroidectomy were enrolled. The intermediate CPB (0.25% ropivacaine 0.2 ml/kg) was performed at the C4-5 intervertebral level carefully, without penetrating the prevertebral fascia, before the patient emerged from general anesthesia. Diaphragmatic motions of the block side were measured by M-mode ultrasonography at three time points: before anesthesia (baseline) and at 30 and 60 min after the intermediate CPB. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis was divided into three grades, depending on the percentage of diaphragm movement compared to the baseline: none (> 75%), partial paresis (25-75%), and complete paresis (< 25%). RESULTS: No patient showed any partial or complete ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis within 60 min after the intermediate CPB. CONCLUSION: Intermediate CPB using 0.2 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine at the C4-5 intervertebral level did not cause ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis. This may imply that the effect of the intermediate CPB on the phrenic nerve is not significant.